Last updated May 11th2003
- A new Police Chief
- The big push for a new County Empire
- Is there a conflict of interest here?
- Electioneering has started in the Provincial election
despite no call
- A Cobourg Councilor humiliates a standing committee
- An editor at the Cobourg Star bites the dust
- The 'commercial space inventory' schemozzle
In a flurry of press releases and a very public introduction
Cobourg met its new Chief of Police. But has this guy been sold a bill of
goods?
To his credit in three interviews he has kept on message: "Cobourg's
force is the best" (we know that!), "I want to set up a public focus group
to discover what the the public is thinking" and "A Regional Police Force
is the only future". It is this last remark that is likely to get him in
political trouble. Any politician with an eye on the County, as opposed to
being stuck up the rear end of Cobourg's superiority complex, will know that
anything that plays well in Cobourg usually bombs out in Port Hope and the
nether land. For anybody to harp on about a Regional Police Force only reinforces
the fact that Cobourg wants it. And that is enough reason for the other municipalities
to deny it. Chief Clement has been told by someone that he will be the Regional
Chief. If he keeps this up the region will fail to materialise. On another
matter those interested in how much we are paying the new Chief should keep
an eye on the annual published list of people making more than $100,000.
It is rumoured that if he is not on it he is very close to being on it.
Incidentally it is also rumoured that Chief Hoath, of Port Hope, has just
signed a new contract for a rumoured $94,000. If that is the case forming
a Regional Force could be problematic with two very expensive Chiefs for
one position! I wish all lots of luck and welcome Chief Clement to Town
On Wednesday the 14th, this week,
the County Council will debate a resolution that will set in motion
another empire to be built at the County level. This debate has shades of
the amalgamation debate; just how much power and services do we want to
give the upper level of government? The debate has been preceded by a report
that was written by the interim Economic Developer - Norm Leigh and the ad-hoc
committee of the existing development officers of Cobourg and Port Hope and
the mastermind behind all of the County's efforts - Dan Borowec. This man
is the manager of the Northumberland Business Assistance, an agency devoted
to helping business develop and is also a third level local bank that lends
money at usurious rates because it is the 'banker of last resort' However
because this agency has access to pots of Federal economic development money
it is able to hide in the shadows and pull strings at the County level. So
the stage is set: Cobourg, Port Hope and Brighton already pay to support
municipal development agencies, Campbellford is in the process of setting
one up and the others don't have one. The votes at the County are weighted
and so if Cobourg, Brighton and Port Hope vote no it will fail by a couple
of votes. Just to complicate the isue and apply pressure on the urban votes
both the MP and the MPP have decided to inject themselves into the debate
saying that a counth department is essential and if they vote for one perhaps
money may be supplied to start up.Therein lies the rub no matter how much
money is put in to start it up Cobourg will end up paying 27% of the operating
costs. And it still hasn't been proven that the new department is going to
be any better than the services we get now without paying more money!!
There is a whiff of a conflict of interest in all of this. A couple
of weeks ago two senior officers of the Cobourg and District Chamber of Commerce
stood before Cobourg Council and tried to persuade Council to vote for a
County wide department of economic Development. When one looks at the documentation
and the recommendations the one tangible item that is proposed is the establishment
and coordination of a database. Well guess what kind of company Ms Susan
Hale, one of the speakers owns? A website design company that specialises
in database construction!!
The local MPP, Doug Galt, has had
his people phoning madly in the latter part of last week trying to get
people to attend an event billed as an "economic summit". This event is
pitched at local politicians and business people. However what the topics
of discussion are are unknown and it is suspected that this gathering will
be an outreach of the budget. I wonder just how many Liberal business people
are going to see through this effort and render the event useless and expose
it for what it is.
At the last regular Council Meeting
one of the councilors, whilst making a motion decided to humiliate and
render a committee decision useless. thus probably leaving the members of
the committee wondering why they bother serving. The topic of the motion
was to deny an application by a commercial enterprise permission to place
their chip truck in the Marina parking lot. Standing up to make the motion
Councilor Bill MacDonald, who really didn't have to say anything and no-one
would have been the wiser, decided to preface his remarks with the comment,
"Although this decision by the committee was to unanimously grant permission,
I feel that was wrong and I recommend the opposite!" I wonder if he realised
the arrogance this displayed? He has effectively written off all the work
done by the committee, in this case the Parks and Rec., and now leaves them
wondering just what kind of support they will get at Council. To have councilors
ignore the advise of the committees that are supposed to provide advise is
dangerous and shows one of two things. Either the councilor did not explain
Council's position very clearly in committee or he doesn't care about what
the committee thinks or does. A very strange position for a councilor who
espouses, in public, a position of listening to the grassroots but in practice
does the opposite.
On Thursday of last week Don Horne
the editor of the Cobourg Daily Star was called into the publisher's office
and Mike Walsh handed him his walking papers. The newsrooms of the Cobourg
Daily Star and the Port Hope Evening Guide are being merged and consequently
management thinks they only need one editor - Francis Bacon. So Don gets the
heave-ho. Sad really when you consider this guy sweated bullets during the
strike trying to straddle the middle line between Walsh's orders that he
stop drinking beer with his friends and fending off accusations from the workers
that he too much manaagement. Still it is rumoured that he has a couple of
offers so perhaps his resume will not be needed after all!
The big story of the week is the release
of the 'commercial space inventory' this is a calculation of just how
much commercial space (square footage) exists in Cobourg. This is important
because this is the base data that consultants use in market studies that
demonstrate whether the Town can handle any more commercial development. Thus
if the data is incorrect the market studies are skewed and inaccurate. The
study just released shows that the amount of commercial space has been understated
by 50%. An amazing discrepency. Just how the politicians are going to handle
this is anybody's guess but it sure looks as though the objectors to the
Walmart development's market study are right in their position that the market
study was flawed. It also means that all of the planning decisions that required
a market study have been based on faulty data. Stay tuned as the application
by Royal Cobourg for another 50,000 sf is in the pipeline and depends on
a market study. We live in interesting times indeed. To read the study
click here
Something to round out the week. Culled
from various sources and which I find interesting.
Swear it is not true
But bullshit has become respectable
Leader
Tuesday May 6, 2003
The Guardian
bullshit vulgar slang n. nonsense v. (-shitted, -shitting) talk nonsense
in an attempt to deceive
It is not often that a word found in the playground or passing between barstools
crosses over into the public conversations of the rich and the powerful. Yet
bullshit has done just that.
On Sunday, billionaire investors Warren Buffet and Charlie Munger told reporters
that American companies were befuddling the markets with "bullshit earnings".
Days before, Rupert Murdoch, the media tycoon, had described the Australian
education system as "bullshit".
Iain Duncan Smith is another purveyor of bovine excreta. The leader of the
Tories, the party of Disraeli and Churchill, used distinctly unparliamentary
language in one interview: "We are going to win the next election. I am not
bullshitting." And not so long ago Kim Howells, the minister for broadcasting,
described the Turner Prize for modern art as "conceptual bullshit".
All this marks a definable shift for the word bullshit. Politicians have
reached for the phrase because they recognise it is vulgar enough to shock,
thereby generating headlines, but not coarse enough to repel voters. Actors
and pop stars, who casually drop le mot bullshit, help to encourage the word's
use as an expression of candid opinion. The accommodation of bullshit could
be seen as symptomatic of a degradation of the English language.
But it is not. A nation addicted to football and the roughly hewn words
of pundits and players might expect to have its lexicon changed. It is worth
noting that British English takes its cue from America, where bullshit is
a relatively mild admonishment.
Fittingly, bullshit originated partly from the new worlds of Australia and
America and partly from the undiplomatic exchanges between soldiers in the
first world war. Accepting expletives into everyday English may seem like
bad news. But it would be worse not to chart and record the shifting shape
of language in people's mouths.
*************************
This URL came to me in an email very interesting but a bit dated as it is
being run by University Students www.electionprediction.com
**************************
> Subject: W H O adviresry for New York, Los Angelas and Miami
>
> The World Health Organization announced in a briefing today that it
> had placed a travel ban for three major U.S. cities.
> As pointed out in the report these three US cities poses a very real
> health risk to visitors and should be avoided where ever possible.
>
> The city of Miami was named as a major health risk due the number of
> deaths due to S.B.S (severe bullet syndrome)
> Representatives of the WHO quoted statistics that In just the three
> years, Miami -Dade experienced 1,079
> gun deaths , in which 109 of the victims were 19 years of age or
> younger. The WHO recommends kevlar vests for any travel in this >
region.
>
> Los-Angeles was put on the list for a old threat that the WHO now
> thinks is on the verge of leveling the city. E.S.B.C.S. (earth shaking
> buildings collapsing syndrome) last killed 51 people and wounded over
> 9000 in under one minute in 1994. The WHO advises anyone who must
> travel to anywhere in California to wear protective head gear.
>
> Finally New York was placed on the list for a health risk the US has
> been fighting for over a year. Apparently A.T.A. (acute terrorism
> attack) is not yet under control and the WHO believes travelers to
the
> big apple are at risk. Total avoidance is recommended for the whole
> NYC region.
>
> The mayors of the three cities reacted with anger saying they were
> actively working to control these serious health problems. The WHO
> concluded that not enough was being done, as all of these problems
> have been out of control for a number of years.
***************************
To reply to this column
click here